Cited by many (seriously check it here)
2015 |
|
![]() | Meissner, Fran Migration in migration-related diversity? The nexus between superdiversity and migration studies Journal Article Ethnic and Racial Studies, 38 (4), pp. 556–567, 2015. Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: comparison, complexity, diversity studies, malleable concept, migration studies, superdiversity | Links: @article{meissner2015migration, title = {Migration in migration-related diversity? The nexus between superdiversity and migration studies}, author = {Fran Meissner}, url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2015.970209 }, doi = {10.1080/01419870.2015.970209 }, year = {2015}, date = {2015-01-01}, journal = {Ethnic and Racial Studies}, volume = {38}, number = {4}, pages = {556--567}, publisher = {Taylor & Francis}, abstract = {This article argues that the notion of ‘superdiversity’ implies an investigation of diversity that goes well beyond the nature of migration origins and trajectories. To probe the academic value of superdiversity, I situate it within broader academic debates, suggesting that it is necessary to distinguish between superdiversity as a malleable social science concept \textendash a set of variables that researchers conjunctively investigate \textendash and superdiversity as a context in which these variables play out in complex social patterns. I argue that complexity is an integral aspect of superdiversity, before explaining how innovative research methods were used to investigate superdiversity in a dual-site project in London and Toronto in order to explore its relevance for global comparative research.}, keywords = {comparison, complexity, diversity studies, malleable concept, migration studies, superdiversity}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } This article argues that the notion of ‘superdiversity’ implies an investigation of diversity that goes well beyond the nature of migration origins and trajectories. To probe the academic value of superdiversity, I situate it within broader academic debates, suggesting that it is necessary to distinguish between superdiversity as a malleable social science concept – a set of variables that researchers conjunctively investigate – and superdiversity as a context in which these variables play out in complex social patterns. I argue that complexity is an integral aspect of superdiversity, before explaining how innovative research methods were used to investigate superdiversity in a dual-site project in London and Toronto in order to explore its relevance for global comparative research. |